Richard at EU Referendum says, "knowledgeable commentators are pointing to 1970 when the pundits confidently predicted a Wilson victory, only to find Heath standing at the door of No. 10 the next day".
I’m confidently asserting that Richard is a deranged fanatic, not a knowledgable commentator. I also confidently predict that anyone mad enough to believe the Tories are going to win tonight should be sectioned and given extreme ECT.
If I’m wrong, I’ll send UKIP a cheque for £25…
So if we can prove any of the following are true you’ll give UKIP £25,
Richard is not a deranged fanatic.
Richard is a knowledgable commentator.
A person who shouldn’t be sectioned and given extreme ECT believes the Tories will win.
I think this calls for pledgebank – "I will give UKIP £25 if 20 million people vote Tory (1 so far, 20 million needed)".
If you add an additional premise "someone who is a deranged fanatic cannot be classed as a knowledgable commentator, even if they have read a great deal of stuff as well as being deranged", I reckon I’m on safe ground.
I guess Richard is one of the bloggers IDS (who?) forecast would rescue the right…
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1417983,00.html
>I’m confidently asserting that Richard is a deranged fanatic
Calm down dear, it’s only a blog.