…it would be Paul Dacre, and not the unfortunate Maxine Carr, who needed protection from crazed foam-mouthed vigilantes.
Update: as Chris points out, you should substitute “less rubbish” for “ideal” in the headline above.
…it would be Paul Dacre, and not the unfortunate Maxine Carr, who needed protection from crazed foam-mouthed vigilantes.
Update: as Chris points out, you should substitute “less rubbish” for “ideal” in the headline above.
Well, I take your point, but surely in an ideal world neither would?