Disjointed thoughts

How can something so boring be so interesting?

Will the President ever sack so many minions that he has to take responsibility for something himself?

Is 47 years a sensible sentence for someone who’s clearly and undeniably a venal tit but not a terrorist? (if you dispute my categorisation, read here. If you still dispute my categorisation, then learn how to read).

What kind of gormless blinkered right-wing arsewit can possibly claim that Hollywood is liberal, in the week where a pro-exorcism movie tops the box office? (answer: many. Best example left in the comments wins some kind of prize.)

Finally, yay us! Good effort; it’s nice to see the British police and judiciary conspiring to lock up foreigners who’re actually guilty and actually deserve it… shame he was tipped off, really.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by John B. Bookmark the permalink.

2 thoughts on “Disjointed thoughts

  1. "… a venal tit but not a terrorist"

    To my astonishment you’re right — despite the fact that almost everything else is terrorism these days, flogging anti-aircraft missiles apparently isn’t.

  2. Oh, one other thing — if this chap is a venal tit just for trying to sell arms to somebody who (it seemed to him) was a bit unpleasant, wouldn’t that make Donald Rumsfeld a venal tit too?

Comments are closed.