"The definition of a head in the sand political ideologue is someone who thinks one side is ‘right’ in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict." – ‘Cockney’ in the Biased BBC comments (of all places).
I’d go further. "The definition of a batshit crazy halfwit who deserves to be brutally eviscerated for the good of humanity is someone who thinks one side is ‘right’ in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict", perhaps.
Anyone who thinks either side is right in any conflict qualifies. The choice in international politics is never between right and wrong: on a good day, it’s between better and worse; usually, it’s between bad and worse.
More material for the John B blogpost template (thanks to Eric):
"Anyone who disagrees with me is a [obscene, baroque expression of disapproval, involving such epithets as "batshit," "mentalist," "twat," "person who should be eviscerated and/or murdered lethally to death" etc etc]"
bit of a sense of humour failure there Jimmy? I’m sure that on quiet reflection you will agree that you were a completely wrong fucking educationally subnormal halfwit and that you ought to have your arms and legs crushed in a cider press.