Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8 Comments on: Got it!
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/got-it/
As fair-minded and non-partisan as Torquemada.Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:16:20 +0000hourly1By: Backword Dave
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/got-it/#comment-5467
Wed, 06 Jul 2005 03:20:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1217#comment-5467Lenin is married? And his mother-in-law *used* to say …? what happened to her? And was she fat?
]]>By: James O
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/got-it/#comment-5462
Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:54:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1217#comment-5462Dick Emery was Lenin’s mother-in-law? The history books will have to be re-written after this one
]]>By: lenin
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/got-it/#comment-5456
Tue, 05 Jul 2005 12:20:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1217#comment-5456Mark Thomas isn’t an SWP member, but I suppose the convention would be that we don’t believe in property. As my mother-in-law used to say to me, "you are awful, but I like you".
]]>By: dsquared
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/got-it/#comment-5455
Tue, 05 Jul 2005 11:38:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1217#comment-5455Len, is there a convention in the SWP that party members are allowed (or even obliged I suppose) to nick each other’s jokes and pass them off as their own? Because the one that John links to above comes from Mark Thomas’ stand-up act in the 1980s, quoted in the book "Reasons To Be Cheerful" by Mark Steel.
]]>By: Andrew Bartlett
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/got-it/#comment-5452
Tue, 05 Jul 2005 10:52:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1217#comment-5452Tim, there’s a book in that story.
Or an ITV 1 Drama Premiere.
]]>By: lenin
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/got-it/#comment-5448
Tue, 05 Jul 2005 09:35:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1217#comment-5448John, you’re too soft. Smack em up, I say! It’s the only language they understand. God knows I’ve tried to speak to them in a sufficiently mono-syllabic fashion, but they just grunt and repeat the phrase "If you don’t get off my foot, sir, you’ll be arrested. And then I’ll bugger you with this truncheon".
]]>By: john b
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/got-it/#comment-5441
Tue, 05 Jul 2005 09:03:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1217#comment-5441"Some sympathy" coming from the whole "we pay their wages so they bloody well ought to act like our servants not our masters" thing, rather than a literal endorsement of violence.
]]>By: Squander Two
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/got-it/#comment-5439
Tue, 05 Jul 2005 09:00:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1217#comment-5439Coem to think of it, we pay the firefighters’ wages. It’s we who whould be entitled to set fire to buildings with people trapped inside. Obviously.
]]>By: Squander Two
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/got-it/#comment-5438
Tue, 05 Jul 2005 08:58:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1217#comment-5438Surely the police are just the armed wing of the civil service. I’m not fond of them myself.
John,
Are your employers entitled to knock you about a bit?
]]>By: Tim Worstall
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/got-it/#comment-5437
Tue, 05 Jul 2005 08:56:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1217#comment-5437As a rabid right whinger I’d just like to point out that I do not think coppers are just great. Idle spongers the lot of them. But then I do think my views might be slightly coloured by the Detective Sergeant who nicked my girlfriend while investigating me.
]]>