Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: National Hitler Day http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/national-hitler-day/ As fair-minded and non-partisan as Torquemada. Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:16:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jim Bliss http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/national-hitler-day/#comment-7187 Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:31:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1097#comment-7187 SDFS… you’re having a laugh, right? Defending an historical figure by pointing out that "barely a million" of the X million deaths caused by his policies were a direct result of massacres is delightfully absurd.

And I find it mind-boggling that there are people giving serious consideration to the question of who was "more evil". What’s the motive there, I wonder? Is it so that revolutionary communists can console themselves with the thought that at least the most murderous exponent of their ideology only killed 20 million. And less than 5% of those were via direct massacre! So there!

I mean, doesn’t it already tell you everything you need to know that you have to compare the guy to Adolf fricking Hitler in order to make him look good?

]]> By: SDFS http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/national-hitler-day/#comment-7181 Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:40:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1097#comment-7181 Stalin was miles better than Hitler. Stalin was responsible for only 20million deaths. While Hitler was responsible for 42million. Most deaths by Stalin were during a civil war and therest in other situations. Th eonly people who claim otherwise are people who have read that that rubbish Mnedveved and Conquest book, that has a crappy view. It says at the bottom of the table that calims Stalin killed 50million, that the numbers of added genocides may be the same figures. In other words he claim a person executed in the Ukrainain famione, as a death in a famine, a death in a gulag and a execution. He also counts people who were never born. For instance in the Ukraina famine the birth rate fell, he includes that as deaths. This is nonsense, as if that were true then that would mean 3.5million not a million died in the Irish famine. And would mean that more people died in world war one than is claimed. For instance all the men were at war during the conflict so that would mean as birth rates fwell hugely around 50milliondied in world war one. And the same happened in Britain, It is insane to claim Stalin killed more, by including a fall in birth rates for the Ukrainiaan famine, but not inclduing the fall ion birth rates in Ukraine during world war two, or the fall in Britain. The stats also claim 10million died in gulags. A insane claim, based on the idea that half the gulag residents died. This claim is dshonest aswell as in the Gulags were ordinary murderers, and war criminals. I do not think that people who were murderers should be included. And anyhow the US alabaman prisons should then be included in that case US "gulags" have killed thousands of people by executions, and putting people in terrible conditions, as criminals allways usually die younger the rest of the population. The gap is 10 years younger for same upbringing people in soem states. The gulag statements is wrong in entirety as it also claims all gulags were as bad as eachother. This is not true. Some gulags were attempts to re-educate, some were virtual death camps, and some were not. Under this the statement of neutral authorities is the huge number 4million died in gulags, political executions and other camps, most of which being inncocent peiople brought to theri during the famine. But to include them twice just so you can claim Hitler was a nice man, is wrong. Hitler was worse and that is that, Stalin caused 20million dead including the post war expulsions. Look at this fact Stalinj said he would kuill all people who surrendered to the nazis in World war two, A wise descion, But in the end loads who had surrendered survived theri stionts in the gulags. We may say well that was evil, but then we have to remember US killings on the Phillipines which killed a million. We have to remember the Japanese empire which killed 27million, in world war two, and remember the first world war which killed 17million. The popular claim that stalin killed more than hitler is nonsese. In truth he killed 20million via famine, and civil war , while hitler kiled 42million. On top of this Stalin ruled longer, and of those barely a million were massacres, for hitler the number is something like 12 million executed

]]> By: Larry http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/national-hitler-day/#comment-4003 Thu, 26 May 2005 13:12:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1097#comment-4003 Yes, it’s really worth it. And that’s a fact, not a heavily biased opinion.

]]> By: Meaders http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/national-hitler-day/#comment-4002 Thu, 26 May 2005 12:32:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1097#comment-4002 Too long. Is it worth it, really? Only after the first two emails I was having severe doubts.

]]>