You wouldn’t be claiming that the US should have launched a pre-emptive attack on a country that had not yet attacked the US just because that country was ruled by an aggressive and murderous dictator, would you?
]]>Other evidence in favour of his stupidity: he appears to have forgotten about the events of November 2004; and he appears to have forgotten which country spent three years fighting the Nazis before his countrymen could even be bothered to join in.
]]>92 rickmoss 4/27/2005 06:55PM PDT
“This aggressive new strain of right-wing religious zealotry is actually a throwback to the intolerance that led to the creation of America in the first place,”
OK, hang-on…. I’m confused.
I knew these guys were world-class whack jobs. But, am I correct in understanding that the most recent contender for the position of POTUS actually thinks the creation of the US is a BAD THING?
What nuanced alternative to the creation of the US would have been preferable? A United States of Great Britain? Would they have stood up to the Nazi and Japan?
]]>