Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Chutzpah http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/chutzpah/ As fair-minded and non-partisan as Torquemada. Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:16:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: Squander Two http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/chutzpah/#comment-3890 Mon, 23 May 2005 11:34:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1078#comment-3890 > someone has violated the Geneva conventions just as Saddam’s troops did during the war.

Well, no, not "just as". There are conventions and there are conventions. No-one in their right mind thinks that the don’t-photograph-people-in-their-underwear convention is as important as the don’t-torture-prisoners convention.

With modern cameras, it strikes me that the only way to ensure that photos like this could definitely never get out would be to allow Saddam absolutely no human contact. I hardly think that would be humane.

]]>
By: backword dave http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/chutzpah/#comment-3859 Sat, 21 May 2005 10:09:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1078#comment-3859 Yes, but it’s a good story. I’m sure that picture sold papers. And Murdoch understands the modern world; international businesses are stronger than governments. Rupe is just showing the White House who’s boss.

Actually, the US should be upset, because someone has violated the Geneva conventions just as Saddam’s troops did during the war. The Pentagon knows that charges of hypocrisy stick, and are right to worry about them. I doubt the Sun cares about that. Photo of an ex world leader almost naked? Hard to resist really.

]]>
By: Michael http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/chutzpah/#comment-3852 Sat, 21 May 2005 05:04:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1078#comment-3852 …and somewhat surprising, given that the Sun is arguably the most pro-Bush pro-war cheerleader across the whole of the British media.

]]>
By: Dan http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/chutzpah/#comment-3846 Fri, 20 May 2005 16:39:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1078#comment-3846 David’s issue of sympathy for Saddam is a red herring. Nobody cares about that. What we care about is the Administration’s willful violation of the rules of war.

The fact that the Administration seems bent on demonizing the press is also very bothersome.

]]>
By: David Duff http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/chutzpah/#comment-3834 Fri, 20 May 2005 09:13:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1078#comment-3834 "Calm down, dear!" "The US military" (however you define that term) almost certainly did not leak that picture. Probably some squaddie, or relative of a squaddie, thought they could earn a quick buck. That’s the American way, God bless them. I must add, that I can feel very little sympathy for the hurt(?) inflicted on a man by showing him in his undies when one considers that this was the man that gassed several hundred Kurds. Mind you, all that shrinks into nothingness when compared to the poor man having his nether regions licked by George Galloway – "the horror, oooh, the horror!"

]]>