Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Perfunctory post http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/01/perfunctory-post/ As fair-minded and non-partisan as Torquemada. Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:16:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: anj http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/01/perfunctory-post/#comment-1895 Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:08:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=713#comment-1895 the assumption behind the survey is that lone parents should be worse off. This follows upon the assumption that if the financial situation of lone parents can be made poor then people will stop becoming divorced. the BBC website reported it thus "Its report said that the state benefit system was skewed in favour of lone parents and if couples with children split, they would be wealthier." Like as if a couple are going to split up (especially for a £1) just to be wealthier. I think most people would prefer a nice happy marriage than an extra few quid. Or am I just an old romantic.

Another thing is remember on that BBC programme ‘who do you think you are’. One of Vic Reeves’ grandparents was a bigamist. He just upped and left and started a family elsewhere read about it here http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/familyhistory/wdytya_celeb_gallery_10.shtml
even though bigamy was illegal people still did it.
passions and emotions don’t obey economic laws. trying to manipulate behaviour by financial means in this way simply impoverishes.

]]>
By: john b http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/01/perfunctory-post/#comment-1879 Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:43:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=713#comment-1879 Bugger. Fixed. And yes, especially the right wing ones that claim to be liberal…

]]>
By: Peter Briffa http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/01/perfunctory-post/#comment-1878 Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:32:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=713#comment-1878 This survey is from the Centre for Policy Studies, not Civitas.

Still, all them think tanks looks the same, don’t they?

]]>