Comments on: Pathetic Fallaci

By: Eugene furbin

Eugene furbin — Wed, 03 Aug 2005 05:56:00 +0000

Response to John B.

I don't have anything to "drive" and never will, to begin with. Secondly, I am an author of books to be published soon in the United Sates. As for fascism, it can take on a lot of colors, which do not conceal its true nature violence and slavery. Like islam - the worst of all types of fascism.

Eugene Furbin, author

By: john b

john b — Wed, 22 Jun 2005 05:31:00 +0000

I think you might be getting confused between the word "author" and the word "mentalist".

Also, aren't the Green Fascists the ones trying to make you give up your right to drive an SUV by spreading evil liberal lies about global warming?

By: Eugene Furbin

Eugene Furbin — Wed, 22 Jun 2005 05:29:00 +0000

John B.is a half-crazed pathetic idiot himself with no principles or morality. He lives among Muslims, as he avers himself, but can't tell shit from gold.Years ago, stupid people like John B.accepted nazies and collaborated with them. Today they choose Red Fascists or Muslims (who are Green Fascists) for their sleazy collaboration. Some of them do it because they are simply politically blind. Yesterday they supported Hitler, today they support Saddam Hussein and the likes of him.

Eugene Furbin, author

By: kirk

kirk — Wed, 25 May 2005 13:08:00 +0000

i’m so grateful and comforted that oriana fallaci is still alive and well on the planet with me… it will be a mournful day for me when she’s gone and a glorious one for the sons’ of allah and the sheeple on this site.

By: Honest guv

Honest guv — Tue, 23 Nov 2004 04:58:00 +0000

Similarly, I have verified that a speech took place in which Prince Charles announced that he was descended from lizards and that as soon as gay partnerships were registered he'd be shacking up with Peter Tatchell and former Archbishop George Carey, with whom he already has a love child.

Of course, I can't verify the actual content of the speech, and neither am I willing to share the evidence with any of you, because those in power won't let me. Or rather, they haven't actually said that they won't let me, and I'm not totally sure who they actually are, but I thought I'd play safe anyway.

Needless to say, this isn't my real e-mail address, but because I'm telling you that it isn't my real e-mail address I'm not deceiving you. I'm not sure why you'd actually care about this semantic quibbling as the net result is exactly the same, but it seems to be fashionable round these parts.

By: The Truth

The Truth — Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:40:00 +0000

P.S.
Just so there is no misunderstanding... :
I have verified that a speech took place - but I have yet to verify the content....
I expect it could be difficult to verify the actual content of the speech , and even more difficult to verify the *true* content of such a speech - difficult because of the power of those involved.

Also , since I refuse to give my e-mail address to post here the e-mail addresses I have had to use to be able to post here is obviously not my e-mail address - which should be obvious for anyone with just the tinyest of common sense. (so no deceit there either)

I came to this forum by coincidence , and don't know if I'll come back.
This is my third posting here.

By: The Truth

The Truth — Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:11:00 +0000

I searched for evidence that a specch had actually taken place and I found nothing until I realized that I had to change my strategy. At the UN it proved virtually impossible to find any evidence that an individual by the name of "Houari Boumedienne" had made any speech in 1974 .
By using an "alternate strategy" I did however find what should be termed as "proof beyond any doubt" that such a speech actually has taken place.
Because I have to get it (the speech) myself I am not ready to "share the evidence" with you now. Believe me - or not - what I have written is true.
SORRY !!!

I am also sorry for calling the "initial writer" at this page an *IDIOT* but I am just so tired from the indifference , hate and abuse from other white people when one speaks the truth - or when one just tries to explain that whites have rights too (such as the right to their own country..... ) .

Please note that anyone can post in this forum using any handle they wish.....
This is my secon post in this forum , thank you.

By: European Loser

European Loser — Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:48:00 +0000

I know for a fact that the speech took place !!!!

How?

By: The Truth

The Truth — Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:31:00 +0000

The POOR *IDIOT* who wrote the above (also shown beneath here) apparently do not find it the least bit strange that the speech *WHICH ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE* cannot be found when searching the UN site either !!!!!
I know for a fact that the speech took place !!!!
The *IDIOT* apparently do *NOT* know how search engine in some cases is controlled by those in power .
Also the *IDIOT* apparently is so stupid that the *IDIOT* thinks that criminals first calls the police themselves and then stands by the phone to wait to be picked up by the police.......
****OFCOURSE**** the UN and those in power does what they can to erase the tracks of what they do and ofcourse the UN is "in" on the whole thing - White American nationalists has said so for years , there is just not anyone who wants to listen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Indeed, Ms Fallaci has a Protocols of the Elders of Zion-esque quote to support her argument. She says, "in 1974, former Algerian President Houari Boumedienne said in a speech at the U.N.: "One day millions of men will leave the southern hemisphere to go to the northern hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory."

Mysteriously, this quote has never been reported in the news (no hits on Factiva or Lexis-Nexis, whether in English or in French), it appears on the Internet only sourced to Ms Fallaci on weblogs, and it is not in the UN's archive. I guess this *could* mean that the liberal dhimmi conspiracy has surpressed coverage of the Muslims' true plans... however, Occam's razor would have another explanation, based on Ms Fallaci making shit up.

By: john b

john b — Thu, 02 Sep 2004 14:56:00 +0000

The America/Muslim-hating comment has already been more than dealt with in comments above. And I agree Islam isn’t a race, although a lot of racists deliberately or accidentally conflate the concepts ‘Muslims’, ‘middle-easterners’ and ‘dark-skinned immigrants’. I certainly don’t think you’re one of them. I also agree that plenty of people with really mad-crazy views claim to be Muslims, and that any prospect of significant advancement for Muslim states in the C21 is heavily reliant on long-overdue religious reforms taking place. This doesn’t necessarily mean so much for Muslims in the West, however.

Fallaci is a terrible writer; I suspect you’re right that Dalrymple would be harder to refute, and I’ll read his writings with interest. The reason I went for Fallaci (and for the tone of the post overall) was because I saw her work being praised by Daniel Pipes, and was shocked and disturbed that anyone even half-respectable could do so.