Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8 Comments on: Conspiracy
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2004/08/conspiracy/
As fair-minded and non-partisan as Torquemada.Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:16:20 +0000hourly1By: Robin Gaskell
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2004/08/conspiracy/#comment-1534
Wed, 01 Dec 2004 05:51:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=333#comment-1534What is most worrying to me is the fact that the Neo-Cons will try to use their collection of "Patriot" legislation to gag the entire US population; and, as people realise that they are going to get gaoled, or shot, for acknowledging that there has been a major governmental ‘black operation,’ they will start coming out in large numbers – talking in the streets about the large body of questionable co-incidences. There is a serious danger that the streets will run with blood as those exerting authoritorian power attempt to hold back the stampede of truth, by using an excess of Law and Order force.
]]>By: jamie
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2004/08/conspiracy/#comment-329
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:21:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=333#comment-329John – I linked to this piece in connecting to the Rigorous Intuition conspiracy rundown at the very same moment that you were commenting on my A level piece.
Coincidence? Incestuous blogging practices?
I think not.
]]>By: Common sense
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2004/08/conspiracy/#comment-325
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:31:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=333#comment-325There is no real doubt that if one looks at the pentagon crash – the ‘pulling of the WT7 – the "put options profiteering" – bogus "collapse" of the WTC without the requisite suppportive conditions for such an event – the fact that the firemen in NYC heard many secondary explosions and that there were 3 major fires burning beneath the WTC for nearly 100 days – just to name few anomomlies – demonstrates that indeed there was prior knowledge by some people. Whether Bush was directly in on the scam or not is really irrelevant. He is DEFINITELY in on the cover up and THAT IS ALL THAT REALLY MATTERS NOW!
]]>By: john b
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2004/08/conspiracy/#comment-324
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 18:58:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=333#comment-324I suspect you’re right, and I’ll put it on my list of things to read. This is why conspiracy theories are appealing: it would be nice to believe that the people in power were competent but had good reasons for fucking up, rather than just being rubbish.
]]>By: Chris Lightfoot
http://sbbs.johnband.org/2004/08/conspiracy/#comment-323
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 18:51:00 +0000http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=333#comment-323Can I reccomend Philip Knightley’s book, "The Second Oldest Profession"? Reading that might put paid to the idea that, "intelligence agencies might be able to stop it next time."
]]>