Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Viva Cuba libre http://sbbs.johnband.org/2004/06/viva-cuba-libre/ As fair-minded and non-partisan as Torquemada. Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:16:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: M@ http://sbbs.johnband.org/2004/06/viva-cuba-libre/#comment-215 Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:31:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=245#comment-215 Then you shurely haven’t read http://www.memes.org/ uh no, shurely that site’s a joke?

]]>
By: john b http://sbbs.johnband.org/2004/06/viva-cuba-libre/#comment-212 Fri, 18 Jun 2004 07:00:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=245#comment-212 They’re not the ones in Miami. Of course that trial was nasty (not to mention bloody stupid in terms of reminding people who were starting to warm to the regime of what Castro is really like).

It would be better were Castro not in charge. However, I’d rather be Cuban than Haitian, I’d rather be Cuban now than Cuban in 1958, and the only effect the American dick-waving has had is to make Castro more paranoid and totalitarian.

(incidentally, the nation state holding the most political prisoners in Cuba is not the one run by Fidel…)

]]>
By: Andrew Brown http://sbbs.johnband.org/2004/06/viva-cuba-libre/#comment-211 Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:04:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=245#comment-211 http://www.socialistinternational.org/9Press%20Releases/Cuba/April03-e.html

Idiots or maniacs? Or does this come under the relatively nasty bit of the regeime?

]]>
By: john b http://sbbs.johnband.org/2004/06/viva-cuba-libre/#comment-210 Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:16:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=245#comment-210 On the contrary, I dealt with him comprehensively: anyone who still believes it can be rejected offhand as an idiot or a maniac. Heh.

]]>
By: Backword Dave http://sbbs.johnband.org/2004/06/viva-cuba-libre/#comment-209 Thu, 17 Jun 2004 07:25:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=245#comment-209 Instapundit then. Heh.]]> You clearly haven’t been reading Instapundit then. Heh.

]]>