They didn’t deserve to die (and to be honest, I think mercenaries in general get a bad press: after all, a lot of people from poor backgrounds join the army to get training/a decent wage/US citizenship, rather than out of honour or love for their countrymen), but they were non-enlisted personnel carrying out a military task in a war zone. That fits at least some definitions of "mercenary", including mine.
]]>I sailed into your blog via your comments on Tim Blair’s site.
You have accepted a convenient self-serving lie by labelling these four Americans "mercenaries". They were not mercenaries. They were American nationals employed to provide security for food shipments as part of a contracted-out American catering operation.
A bloke I know is employed by the CPA to help develop Iraq’s telecommunications infrastructure. I guess that makes him a "mercenary", too.
Hanging the label "mercenary" on these men is deeply unfair. I don’t expect you to feel profound sorrow at their deaths – I don’t either because I didn’t know them. But a little common decency requires us not to make up lies about their character and motivations to try to fit them into our preferred script and "justify" what happened to them.
]]>