Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Product of the year http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/product-of-the-year/ As fair-minded and non-partisan as Torquemada. Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:16:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: Tim Worstall http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/product-of-the-year/#comment-6465 Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:50:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1266#comment-6465 No, sorry NIB, that doesn’t work. You can’t possibly be suggesting that JohnB would actually be solicitous about his commenters, can you?

]]>
By: N.I.B. http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/product-of-the-year/#comment-6453 Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:18:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1266#comment-6453 Oh what the hell:

Several? Just how many clitori are you trying to take care of these days John?

"Well have you seen the number of cunts round here lately?"

]]>
By: Backword Dave http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/product-of-the-year/#comment-6451 Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:12:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1266#comment-6451 Tim, don’t blame John, blame Duracell ;)

N.I.B. — you’re not referring to the one Eric already tried to make? (I didn’t realise that vibrator use was reserved for "sexual soloists")

]]>
By: N.I.B. http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/product-of-the-year/#comment-6450 Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:04:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1266#comment-6450 Tim – I can feel a rather nasty joke about certian SBBS Commenters coming on. I’d post it if this was my blog.

]]>
By: Tim Worstall http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/product-of-the-year/#comment-6446 Wed, 20 Jul 2005 06:30:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1266#comment-6446 Several? Just how many clitori are you trying to take care of these days John?

]]>
By: john b http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/product-of-the-year/#comment-6431 Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:39:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1266#comment-6431 Now, is that a Biased BBC-er or a Popinjay? Damn, in the old days you knew who was insulting you…

]]>
By: jealous of your success http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/product-of-the-year/#comment-6430 Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:35:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1266#comment-6430 No doubt the manufacturers will be thrilled to receive a product endorsement from ‘One of the UK’s most prominent sexual soloists’

]]>
By: Lorna http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/product-of-the-year/#comment-6428 Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:19:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1266#comment-6428 Backword Dave – yes, since it’s a clitoral vibrator ;) But yes, that disturbed me, too.

That could only be more fabulous if it were glittery. Damn impoverished studenthood.

]]>
By: N.I.B. http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/product-of-the-year/#comment-6425 Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:33:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1266#comment-6425 Have I been looking for the G-spot in the wrong place all these years?

Who cares?

(sorry. honestly)

]]>
By: Backword Dave http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/07/product-of-the-year/#comment-6424 Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:23:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1266#comment-6424 So why is the woman in the picture wearing the thing on the outside of her thigh? Have I been looking for the G-spot in the wrong place all these years?

]]>