Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Brought to account http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/06/brought-to-account/ As fair-minded and non-partisan as Torquemada. Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:16:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: Chris b http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/06/brought-to-account/#comment-4099 Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:07:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1109#comment-4099 Christ. American shareholders are, as we speak, loading their semi-automatic rifle and flicking through the Bible for the bit where it says: "Ye verily, the Lord did smite down those who indulged in cooking the books."

God I love plagirism

]]> By: Matt Daws http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/06/brought-to-account/#comment-4085 Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:36:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1109#comment-4085 Could you elaborate on this? I agree that the ruling seems to be correct: the jury was instructed wrongly in the original trial. However, to me it seems that shredding documents after you know that a major company is about to go down, partly because of highly dodgy accounting practises, is, well, probably not legal. Certainly not right.

So I’m not sure I see why you say "witchcraft conviction". They weren’t being accused of witchcraft were they; they were accused of illegal accountacy practises? Or have I got this wrong?

]]>