Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Gorgeous George http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/gorgeous-george/ As fair-minded and non-partisan as Torquemada. Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:16:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: Yusuf Smith http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/gorgeous-george/#comment-3631 Mon, 09 May 2005 06:10:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1047#comment-3631 No, Nathan Barley isn’t a twat, he’s something else …

]]>
By: Meaders http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/gorgeous-george/#comment-3630 Sun, 08 May 2005 10:55:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1047#comment-3630 Jimmy – no problem, I imagine you had just been lead astray by foolish remarks from the likes of Nick Cohen. That various apparent liberals can’t tell the difference between racism and opposing racism is a little worrying.

Worse yet when they contrive to present the only significant party standing in BG&B not playing up to "communalism" as doing precisely that. Compare any of Respect’s public statements or its literature with, say, New Labour’s claim in "white" areas that Galloway was "stirring it up" amongst the Bengali community, or New Labour’s use of two different leaflets – one mentioning Muslims repeatedly, the other not – for different parts of the constituency. Fortunately, none of these unpleasant and divisive tricks worked.

]]>
By: dsquared http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/gorgeous-george/#comment-3629 Sat, 07 May 2005 17:52:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1047#comment-3629 For the matter of that, D2, I’m sure BNP gains would piss Oliver off just as much as the Bow result, if not more

Really? I’ve not seen much textual evidence for this. Going by the ratio of posts on his website, I would assume that a Galloway win would piss him off approximately ten times as much.

In any case, I’m apparently much less scared than the rest of the blogosphere by the Big Bad BNP. As far as I can see, of all the things that British fascists might be doing with their time, electoral campaigning is about the least harmful. Furthermore, it’s not just a matter of people off; if Mrs Kamm turned out to be shagging the milkman then I would imagine that would piss Oliver off greatly but would give me no particular pleasure. The point about Galloway winning is that those people who it winds up are, in general, being wound up for the right reason; that reason being that they had invested a great deal of their self-esteem in a particularly irritating and self-righteous approach to a contentious political issue, and backed the wrong horse.

I’ve got a post up on Crooked Timber if you want to be a bit more saddened and disappointed, btw, Jimmy.

]]>
By: Jimmy Doyle http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/gorgeous-george/#comment-3628 Sat, 07 May 2005 16:16:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1047#comment-3628 Oh right Meaders; my mistake. Thanks for setting me straight.

]]>
By: Meaders http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/gorgeous-george/#comment-3627 Sat, 07 May 2005 15:59:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1047#comment-3627 What a stupid bloody series of comments from Jimmy Doyle.

Oswald Mosley arrived in the East End to attack immigrants. Galloway arrived to defend them. See the difference?

]]>
By: Jimmy Doyle http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/gorgeous-george/#comment-3626 Sat, 07 May 2005 15:17:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1047#comment-3626 For the matter of that, D2, I’m sure BNP gains would piss Oliver off just as much as the Bow result, if not more. Can we conclude that part of you was secretly longing for that as well? Go and have a look at Lenin’s Tomb — check out your fellow-chucklers.

]]>
By: Squander Two http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/gorgeous-george/#comment-3622 Fri, 06 May 2005 12:15:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1047#comment-3622 A colleague of mine said earlier that she was glad Galloway had won because he was a thorn in the side of Tony Blair. I replied that any BNP wins would also have been thorns in Blair’s side, but that was no reason to wish for them. And there, I’ve just said it again.

]]>
By: dsquared http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/gorgeous-george/#comment-3619 Fri, 06 May 2005 08:40:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1047#comment-3619 I didn’t find much to chuckle about in Oswald Mosley or Guy Burgess, either

Me neither but I suspect that if Oliver Kamm had been around in those days things might have turned out differently.

]]>
By: Mat http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/gorgeous-george/#comment-3618 Fri, 06 May 2005 08:34:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1047#comment-3618 Little Green Soccer Balls? Fantastic, you nailed it. (And GG nailed them!)

]]>
By: Chris Baldwin http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/05/gorgeous-george/#comment-3617 Fri, 06 May 2005 08:21:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=1047#comment-3617 Fair does, but I’d expect that both groups would vote mainly for the Tories. Or maybe not vote in the case of 2).

]]>