Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Survey summarised http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/03/survey-summarised/ As fair-minded and non-partisan as Torquemada. Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:16:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: Simon http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/03/survey-summarised/#comment-2449 Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:08:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=863#comment-2449 I’d have been happy with Dobson as mayor, though not that godawful woman Labour attempted to put up last year before seeing sense and welcoming Ken back into the fold.

]]>
By: Harry http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/03/survey-summarised/#comment-2448 Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:58:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=863#comment-2448 If people always voted Labour in London mayoral elections than we would never have had ‘Red’ Ken.

Instead we would have had a mayor with an appropriate beard for meeting Al-Quaradi.

]]>
By: Nick http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/03/survey-summarised/#comment-2447 Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:52:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=863#comment-2447 Doesn’t that depend on who the candidate is in 2008?

]]>
By: dsquared http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/03/survey-summarised/#comment-2444 Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:11:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=863#comment-2444 Doesn’t there need to be an asterisk or something with "except in the London Mayoral elections"?

]]>
By: Backword Dave http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/03/survey-summarised/#comment-2436 Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:40:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=863#comment-2436 Norm</a> that a <a href=http://www.guardian.co.uk/letters/story/0,3604,1430189,00.html>Labour MP</a> criticized Livingstone. This would be the same <a href=http://backword.me.uk/2005/March/verygenerous.html>Louise Ellman</a> who, through her own hard work, secured a contract for the renewal of Liverpool Street Station (in her constituency) with <a href=http://backword.me.uk/2005/March/verygenerous.html>her employers</a>. Once we'd have called it sleaze. Now it's synergy.]]> Harry. Love you, mate and all that, but whose party? Blair isn’t secular, nor is Mandelson. Robin Cook is probably atheist. Tony Benn claims to be Christian, but weakly so. Ken Livingstone is a doubter, for sure. Get one of them in the top spot and I’ll come back. Anyone who prays with an executioner is a cunt in my book.

Could the Sunday Express story be true? Tom Watson must be sweating bullets. Unemployment may beckon. Stupid, fat, ugly, white guy – only talent sucking cock. No takers? Poor dear may starve. I blame Thatcher. I see through Norm that a Labour MP criticized Livingstone. This would be the same Louise Ellman who, through her own hard work, secured a contract for the renewal of Liverpool Street Station (in her constituency) with her employers. Once we’d have called it sleaze. Now it’s synergy.

]]>
By: Harry http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/03/survey-summarised/#comment-2434 Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:53:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=863#comment-2434 Very good.

The party line is, however:

Vote Labour and Build a Fighting Secular Alternative (inside the Labour Party).

]]>