Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Telegraph descends to Mail level http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/telegraph-descends-to-mail-level/ As fair-minded and non-partisan as Torquemada. Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:16:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jemery Smull http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/telegraph-descends-to-mail-level/#comment-2176 Tue, 15 Feb 2005 08:59:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=781#comment-2176 Bullies and thugs should be locked up. Thye are the abusive thugs. Why it is. The right wiong a wrong, but that does not mena it is left wing to stand up for bullies and thugs who abuse others.
It is not liberla or left wing to support bullies and thugs and snobby bullying thugs.
DONT SUPPORT BULLIES

]]>
By: Bystander http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/telegraph-descends-to-mail-level/#comment-2156 Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:19:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=781#comment-2156 You are quite right about the tendency of the press to talk up potential sentences and to minimise actual ones.

Just one thing though – it is standard practice to leave all options open for pre-sentence reports, just in case a different judge or bench inposes the eventual sentence. This way their hands are not tied. If you have custody strongly in mind it is usual to warn the defendant.

I have just looked up my sentencing guidelines book and there is nothing in it about firearms because the few cases we do see go straight to Crown Court. If I was a betting man I would say 9 months suspended for two years.

]]>
By: Mat http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/telegraph-descends-to-mail-level/#comment-2153 Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:24:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=781#comment-2153 "it’s trying to deceive the easily led sections of its readership."

No newspaper ever went bankrupt with this strategy.

]]>