Pension revisionism

I love the Adam Smith Institute. Err, sorry, what I meant to say was ‘I think the Adam Smith Institute are an absolute bunch of jokers’.

They’re trying to blame the UK pension funds crisis on Labour’s not very onerous pension taxation. My personal suggestion might be that it might be closer related to… oooh… the existence of a bloody great stock market bubble that artificially inflated returns for years, led to companies taking pension holidays they couldn’t afford, and made everyone believe they had adequate savings when they didn’t.

Presumably the reason for ASI’s sophistry is that the things that went wrong in the UK are pretty much inevitable if your pensions system is privatised. The claim ‘the UK system only went wrong because everyone involved was greedy and stupid’ wouldn’t necessarily inspire hope and optimism about Bush’s latest crazy rip-off.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by John B. Bookmark the permalink.

6 thoughts on “Pension revisionism

  1. "Britain’s pension system was a success. The state system was a swindle, but people had private or company pensions instead. Because they could be invested anywhere in the world, they gave savers much higher returns for their money than the state ever could."

    Christ, what an absolute dick. Notable that the pensions mis-selling scandal doesn’t even merit a mention in his potted history – I wonder why that would be? Anything to do with the fact the ‘free market’ took large chunks out of people’s savings in administrative fees, leaving them much worse off then if they’d stuck with nasty old statist SERPS?

    More importantly, has any right-wing ‘think-tank’ ever said anything of use? Or indeed anything you couldn’t have picked up yourself from reading the first five pages of an introductory economics textbook, which is clearly the point at which they all stopped reading?

  2. Simon – on the bright side, it’s nice to know that (should you ever be in really dire need of employment) the simple phrase "Well… The micro stuff was good, but the macro course was a bit of a turn off." pretty much guarantees you a job.

  3. Yes, it’s much like most people on the right appear to believe that private pensions immediately fix the demographic problems facing the state system.

  4. Perhaps if you had any knowledge of the pensions industry you would realise that Labour *is* taxing pensions to a ridiculous degree. Their new scam involves taxing the surplus of With-Profits funds (which are owned by policyholders) at corporation tax rates (up to 30%). This will mean a massive reduction in policyholder benefits. Because the tax is not transparent to the ignorant the fuckwit government can then blame the nasty pensions companies.

  5. Bollocks. Labour’s moves have effectively cut tax for poorer people while stopping rich people from avoiding tax om their large investments.

    The problems with pensions have come partly from with-profits funds and partly from employer schemes. In both cases, the companies administering the scheme overestimated future benefits, hence the problems they’re now left with. Meanwhile, the general individual pensions industry isn’t screwed because it hasn’t saddled itself with the same unmeetable liabilities.

    You *can’t* make everyone a consistent 10-12% per year in an economy where growth is running at 2-3% and interest rates are 3-5%. That doesn’t add up, and if you can’t see that then you’re the fuckwit.

Comments are closed.