Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Nine people required http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/nine-people-required/ As fair-minded and non-partisan as Torquemada. Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:16:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: frank http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/nine-people-required/#comment-2322 Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:12:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=817#comment-2322 Interesting hour-long interview (RealPlayer format) with Mark Steyn on US cable TV – especially from 14:00 onwards.

]]>
By: hungbunny http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/nine-people-required/#comment-2310 Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:00:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=817#comment-2310 Is "better than having your testicles sandpapered by Avril Lavigne" a compliment? I asked Jeeves but he got overexcited and couldn’t answer.

]]>
By: dsquared http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/nine-people-required/#comment-2288 Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:43:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=817#comment-2288 He won! Gdonyer Mark!

]]>
By: Nick http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/nine-people-required/#comment-2287 Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:40:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=817#comment-2287 Steyn 133, Dion 123. I suggest we now start a campaign to have the poll closed instantly in the name of fairness, decency and getting the result we want.

]]>
By: dsquared http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/nine-people-required/#comment-2285 Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:00:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=817#comment-2285 Steyn 127, Dion 122! In your (somewhat oddly shaped) face!!!

]]>
By: John S http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/nine-people-required/#comment-2280 Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:17:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=817#comment-2280 I have to disagree about Rachel Weisz and place her firmly in the cute column. Although the mental picture of Sean Thomas ‘snogging’ her is almost enough to ruin it for me.

]]>
By: dave heasman http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/nine-people-required/#comment-2278 Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:42:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=817#comment-2278 Dion 122
Steyn 121

It’s Mark-mentum!

]]>
By: Matthew Turner http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/nine-people-required/#comment-2277 Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:14:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=817#comment-2277 Rachel Weisz was the second-best thing in that comedy classic, About a Boy.

The best thing of course was Grant in that scene where the boy was singing "killing me softly", and Grant’s character saves the day by joining him playing guitar. I’ve never seen a more embarassing scene in a film. It was Tottenesque.

]]>
By: dsquared http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/nine-people-required/#comment-2276 Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:30:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=817#comment-2276 Ahhhh, Avril Lavigne, the Britney Spears for people who think they’re too cool to like Britney Spears. I think that, like so many men, you’ve confused "she is really cute" with "she is wearing panda-like eye make up". To be honest, the Rachel Weisz thing is another data point in favour of this theory.

I’ve done the business, and would remind people that if they work for a living and have an internet connection at home, they can vote for Steyn twice a day.

]]>
By: Chicken Yoghurt http://sbbs.johnband.org/2005/02/nine-people-required/#comment-2274 Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:52:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=817#comment-2274 Avril doesn’t count anyway as she was grown in a laboratory as part of the ongoing experiment to prove the theory that fools and their money are soon parted.

]]>