Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/index.php:1) in /home/johnband/sbbs.johnband.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Inscrutable http://sbbs.johnband.org/2003/11/inscrutable/ As fair-minded and non-partisan as Torquemada. Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:16:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: Scruton http://sbbs.johnband.org/2003/11/inscrutable/#comment-2707 Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:25:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=53#comment-2707 Scruton’s argument is very persuassive. Your own bias is probably inhibiting your understanding.

]]>
By: john b http://sbbs.johnband.org/2003/11/inscrutable/#comment-2000 Tue, 01 Feb 2005 19:38:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=53#comment-2000 While I’m tempted by your theory, it would involve admitting that being a pisshead undermines one’s mental faculties, which isn’t a conclusion to which I want to come any time soon.

]]>
By: anj http://sbbs.johnband.org/2003/11/inscrutable/#comment-1997 Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:17:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=53#comment-1997 doesn’t he write the wine column in the new statesman …maybe his brain addles his facts

]]>
By: Michael http://sbbs.johnband.org/2003/11/inscrutable/#comment-1984 Tue, 01 Feb 2005 03:35:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=53#comment-1984 I vividly remember the Scruton piece on Photography and Representation, as I had to write a criticism of it for my own university philosophy course.

I forget precisely what I said (though I’d be surprised if it essentially differed from John’s précis), but I do vividly recall being ticked off for using the word "ludicrous" – although my tutor agreed that this was entirely fair comment, he told me that such language was inappropriate in academic discourse.

]]>
By: Harry Hutton http://sbbs.johnband.org/2003/11/inscrutable/#comment-1980 Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:03:00 +0000 http://sbbs.johnband.org/?p=53#comment-1980 He doesn’t live in a town. He lives in a village deep in Wallyland.

]]>